Skip to content
Comparison

In-house hiring or contracting with us

Both options can be suitable depending on your operating model. This comparison lays out the practical differences criterion by criterion, from registration and Saudization to payroll, risk, and management time, so you can judge which one fits your business more appropriately, without sales language.

Staff registration

In-house hiring

On your company record

Contracting with team360

Under our entity, documented on Ajeer

Saudization (Nitaqat)

In-house hiring

Your company's obligation

Contracting with team360

Ours, with no Nitaqat exposure for staff we supply

Day-to-day supervision

In-house hiring

Handled internally

Contracting with team360

Handled internally (remains with the client)

Regulatory management

In-house hiring

Dedicated internal team

Contracting with team360

We carry it fully

Government platforms

In-house hiring

Each tracked separately

Contracting with team360

One vendor handles all

Payroll & WPS

In-house hiring

Internal payroll system

Contracting with team360

Included within the monthly service fee

Cost structure

In-house hiring

Multiple variable line items

Contracting with team360

One declared monthly invoice

Regulatory risk

In-house hiring

On the company

Contracting with team360

We carry it within scope

Recruitment & visas

In-house hiring

Company responsibility

Contracting with team360

Inside the service

Replacement

In-house hiring

Internal procedures

Contracting with team360

Managed on our side

Management time

In-house hiring

High

Contracting with team360

Lower

Best fit

In-house hiring

For organizations with mature internal HR teams

Contracting with team360

For those who prefer to focus on their core business

Next step

Ready to see the difference on your own numbers?

Send us your roles and headcount, and we'll return a documented quote that lays both models side by side for your facility — within five business days, with no obligation.